Home › Essay › Environment

Environment in the Essay paper.

These are topics UPSC actually set. For each one: what it really asks, the one argument to hold, a spine to write along, and where to find the examples.

UPSC Essay 2024

Forests precede civilizations and deserts follow them

What the topic really asks

The topic is about time. Forests are what a civilization starts with; deserts are what careless use leaves behind. You are asked whether this decline is a law of history or a choice.

The one argument

A civilization lives on natural capital it did not create. It lasts only as long as it uses that capital more slowly than nature rebuilds it.

Spine

  1. What forests give first. Soil, steady water, rainfall, timber, food and fuel. Early settlements grew where forests and rivers made farming possible.
  2. How growth eats its base. Clearing for farms, overgrazing, heavy irrigation and mining give quick gains. Soil erodes, land turns salty, water tables fall.
  3. History as evidence. Farmland in ancient Mesopotamia lost fertility as irrigation made the soil salty. The Aral Sea shrank after its rivers were diverted for cotton.
  4. The same story today. Deforestation, land degradation and climate change now work together. In India the concern is desertification and the loss of hill and forest cover.
  5. The counter-view. Decline is not fate. Chipko, joint forest management and large replanting efforts, such as South Korea’s after the 1950s, show that deserts can be pushed back.
  6. Way forward. Count natural capital when measuring growth, protect what cannot be replaced, and give local communities a stake in keeping forests standing.

Watch out

Do not write that civilization is the enemy of nature. The stronger position: civilizations that looked after their forests survived longer.

A line worth underlining

A society is not judged by the forests it found, but by the forests it leaves.

Examples from Mains: Forests & Wildlife →Ecology & Ecological Balance →Development, EIA & Dams →Biodiversity →

Facts from Prelims: Nature’s Machinery →Wild Places →

UPSC Essay 2018

Alternative technologies for a climate-change-resilient India

What the topic really asks

Three words decide the essay. "Alternative" means different from the current fossil-fuel and water-heavy path. "Resilient" means able to absorb shocks, so adaptation matters as much as cutting emissions. "India" means solutions that fit Indian conditions and budgets.

The one argument

Resilience comes from technology that fits the place and reaches the poor, not from the most advanced machine.

Spine

  1. Why India is exposed. Monsoon-dependent farming, a long coastline, Himalayan glaciers, heat stress and crowded cities.
  2. Energy. Solar, wind, storage and green hydrogen cut emissions and also reduce dependence on imported fuel.
  3. Farming and water. Micro-irrigation, drought- and flood-tolerant seeds, millets, rainwater harvesting and revived traditional systems such as tanks and johads.
  4. Cities and disasters. Cool roofs, public transport, better drainage and early warning systems that save lives during cyclones and heat waves.
  5. The counter-view. Technology alone does not create resilience. Cost, access, maintenance, behaviour and institutions decide whether it works.
  6. Way forward. Mix modern and traditional knowledge, finance the last mile, and let local bodies choose what suits their area.

Watch out

Avoid a list of gadgets. Each technology must answer one Indian vulnerability.

A line worth underlining

The best technology for a warming India is the one a small farmer can afford and repair.

Examples from Mains: Climate Change →Development, EIA & Dams →Waste Management →

Facts from Prelims: Warming World →

UPSC Essay 2017

We may brave human laws but cannot resist natural laws

What the topic really asks

A contrast between two kinds of law. Human laws can be broken, bargained with or changed. Natural laws carry consequences that no court can stay. The essay wants you to show this difference and what follows from it.

The one argument

Human laws work only when they agree with natural laws. Where they ignore them, nature delivers the judgement.

Spine

  1. Meaning. Human laws are rules people make. Natural laws are cause and effect: gravity, limits of an ecosystem, the water cycle, the needs of the body.
  2. Braving human laws. People build on floodplains, clear forests and pollute rivers, often legally or without punishment.
  3. Nature does not negotiate. The 2013 Kedarnath floods and the 2015 Chennai floods showed the cost of building across river paths and over wetlands.
  4. Beyond environment. The same holds for health, ageing and the limits of resources. Delay does not cancel the result.
  5. The counter-view. Humans do not only obey nature. Science uses natural laws to fly, cure disease and grow more food. The point is to work with these laws, not against them.
  6. Way forward. Make human law follow natural law: impact assessment before projects, the precautionary principle, and respect for carrying capacity.

Watch out

Do not present humans as helpless. Present a choice between working with natural laws and paying for ignoring them.

A line worth underlining

A human law can be appealed; a natural law can only be understood.

Examples from Mains: Development, EIA & Dams →Ecology & Ecological Balance →Climate Change →Wetlands →

Facts from Prelims: Nature’s Machinery →Rules for the Planet →

UPSC Essay 2016

Water disputes between States in federal India

What the topic really asks

This is a federalism essay with a river running through it. Explain why shared rivers create conflict between States, how the Constitution handles it, and what would reduce the conflict.

The one argument

A river is one system, but it is governed in pieces. Disputes last because the pieces are divided by politics while the river is shared by nature.

Spine

  1. Why rivers create disputes. Rivers cross State borders. Upstream use reduces downstream supply, and farming and cities in each State depend on it.
  2. The constitutional design. Water is a State subject (Entry 17, State List). Parliament can regulate inter-State rivers (Entry 56, Union List). Article 262 and the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 provide for tribunals.
  3. How disputes play out. Cauvery, Krishna and Ravi-Beas show long tribunal processes, contested awards and disputes rising in dry years.
  4. The ecological side. Dividing water by volume ignores the river itself: minimum flows, pollution, groundwater and the health of the basin.
  5. The counter-view. Disputes are also a sign of working federalism. States bargain, tribunals decide and courts enforce, without the Union imposing a solution.
  6. Way forward. Manage by river basin, share data openly, use water more efficiently, and settle disputes within fixed time limits.

Watch out

Do not reduce the essay to a list of disputes. The examiner wants the federal reason behind them.

A line worth underlining

States can divide a river on paper; they can keep it only together.

Examples from Mains: River & Water Pollution →Development, EIA & Dams →Wetlands →

Facts from Prelims: Pollution Files →Rules for the Planet →

UPSC Essay 2026

Nature is the symbol of the spirit

What the topic really asks

A philosophical topic. It asks how the outer world of nature and the inner life of people are connected. Environment facts are supporting evidence here, not the main body.

The one argument

The way a society treats nature shows the state of its inner life, and the loss of nature is also a loss of meaning.

Spine

  1. Meaning. Nature gives people their images for inner states: growth, seasons, storms, stillness. We understand ourselves through it.
  2. Indian traditions. Sacred groves, rivers treated as mothers and communities such as the Bishnois, who protect trees and animals as a duty.
  3. When nature is lost. A dried river or a cut forest also removes festivals, livelihoods, songs and identity. The damage is cultural as well as ecological.
  4. The counter-view. Nature is not always gentle. Floods, droughts and earthquakes are also nature. Avoid a romantic picture; the spirit includes humility and fear.
  5. Modern relevance. Consumption without limit reflects restlessness within. Conservation is therefore an ethical choice, not only a policy.
  6. Close. Protecting nature protects the source from which people draw their sense of what matters.

Watch out

Keep it reflective. Use one or two concrete examples, not a policy list.

A line worth underlining

What we do to the forest, we first do within ourselves.

Examples from Mains: Biodiversity →Forests & Wildlife →Wetlands →

Facts from Prelims: Species Watch →Wild Places →

These are thinking guides, not model essays. Write the essay in your own words.